Prevent tenant data leakage
Safe Boundary enforces row-level security per tenant, per query, in real time, at the proxy layer, not inside the database engine. Same isolation guarantees across PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, and MySQL. No RLS performance penalty. Automatic injection of missing tenant conditions.

Tenant isolation is the hardest problem in multi-tenant SaaS
One tenant seeing another's data is a company-ending event.
It almost never happens because of a malicious actor, it happens because a developer
forgot WHERE tenant_id = ?, or an AI agent generated SQL without tenant context, or a new
engineer missed the convention.
Native row-level security (Postgres RLS, Oracle VPD, SQL Server RLS) is the right concept but
painful at production scale, with documented 70x to 150x slowdowns, sequential scans, and timeouts on multi-table joins.
Teams disable RLS and trust the app layer, where leaks happen.
How Safe Boundary enforces tenant isolation
Three controls run on the wire, not in your application: tenant predicates injected before execution when the tenant context is known, missing-tenant queries refused when it isn't, and missing indexes flagged before they cause an outage. Same RLS guarantees that native engines promise, without the RLS performance penalty.

The native RLS penalty
The native RLS performance problem is well-documented across all engines. Postgres benchmarks below; Oracle's VPD and SQL Server's RLS exhibit similar patterns. Multiple independent Postgres benchmarks show common multi-tenant patterns running 70x to 150x slower than the same query without RLS, before any expert tuning is applied.
| Workload | RLS slowdown vs. no RLS | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1M-row table, subquery-based RLS policy | ~150x | Dian M Fay |
| Join-based RLS policy on a tenant-scoped table | 70x to 110x | agonopol benchmark, GitHub |
| Unwrapped helper functions on large tables | 1,500x and up | Supabase RLS performance docs |
The reasons are architectural. Helper functions like auth.uid() are treated as
volatile and re-evaluated per row. Policies act as security barriers that defeat predicate
pushdown, force sequential scans, and break index-only scans and partition pruning.
Mitigations exist (wrap auth functions in subqueries, mark helpers STABLE, denormalize
tenant_id, index every policy column), but they require deep engine-specific tuning expertise that
most application teams cannot dedicate.
Safe Boundary takes a different path. Tenant predicates are injected at the proxy layer before the query reaches the database engine, so the planner sees a regular WHERE clause it can use the index on. Same isolation guarantees as RLS, none of the policy-evaluation overhead.
First-class AI agent identity
Named agents with scoped policies, example configuration:
Violations: blocked. Allowed queries: full audit, agent, tenant, outcome.

Pricing for Multi-Tenant SaaS
Scale tiers follow your tenant and database growth, no per-seat traps.
Startup
Coming soon
250k queries/DB/mo
Pro
Coming soon
2M queries/DB/mo
Business
Coming soon
10M queries/DB/mo, 10-DB min
Related features
Safe Boundary capabilities work together as a single defense layer in front of your database. Combine identity, query control, masking, and audit to build the policy your team and your auditors actually need.
Automated PII Masking
AI-classified PII redacted in result rows so cross-tenant exposures stay contained even if a query slips through.
Explore moreSSO Human Identity Enforcement
Map every internal user to their verified SSO identity in the audit log, replace shared app_user.
Explore moreQuery Analytics & Logging
Identity-aware audit trail for every query, every tenant, every outcome, straight into your SIEM.
Explore moreTime-limited Access Grants
Issue scoped, expiring access for support cases without permanent role changes or stale credentials.
Explore moreEvery feature is enforced at the proxy, no application changes, no SDK to install, no database migration required.
Configure your first rewrite rule , no application code changes required.
Enforce tenant isolation at the wire, same guarantees as native RLS, none of the latency hit.